tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post1665448964663554826..comments2023-08-07T21:58:26.720-04:00Comments on Pistrina Liturgica: "OF ALL THE WEEK'S THE UNLUCKIEST DAY"The Readerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comBlogger116125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-11543848869669842972018-01-27T21:33:27.065-05:002018-01-27T21:33:27.065-05:00Let's see this "Ode."Let's see this "Ode." Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-82613821772347430392018-01-27T11:15:59.119-05:002018-01-27T11:15:59.119-05:00Because trads have nowhere to go to prove nullity ...Because trads have nowhere to go to prove nullity in order to obtain a declaration by judicial process. In other words, there are no diocesan courts for matrimonial cases and no Sacred Roman Rota in Tradistan, and there never can be.The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-91031806682435918472018-01-27T05:39:36.169-05:002018-01-27T05:39:36.169-05:00Why can't Traditional Catholics receive annulm...Why can't Traditional Catholics receive annulments?<br />What if they're married in the Novus Ordo and discover the truth 5-10 yrs later?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-60415765026702627552018-01-24T07:01:39.180-05:002018-01-24T07:01:39.180-05:00Why?
Have you ever been stuck in a nightmare livin...Why?<br />Have you ever been stuck in a nightmare living Hell Marriage?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-6858756448438808712018-01-20T13:31:48.807-05:002018-01-20T13:31:48.807-05:00That's too bad as it was brilliantly written. ...That's too bad as it was brilliantly written. I hope someone can find it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-3624847163915830352018-01-19T17:41:53.022-05:002018-01-19T17:41:53.022-05:00Thanks for the link. I've found references, in...Thanks for the link. I've found references, including the one above to a "watershed," but the thing itself seems oddly hidden under a bushel.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-1155182251444079502018-01-18T09:57:25.364-05:002018-01-18T09:57:25.364-05:00You don't get it, do you? $GG died in 2009. Th...You don't get it, do you? $GG died in 2009. The only movement you see now is that caused by maggots on a decomposing corpse.<br /><br />Gladius was 100% right. The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-84916414549598746472018-01-18T09:29:57.802-05:002018-01-18T09:29:57.802-05:00I know it is true.
You know it is true.
But obvio...I know it is true.<br />You know it is true. <br />But obviously you are too scared to post it because it shows how wrong you and Shea have been about the predicted demise.<br /><br /><br />Back almost 10 years ago, together with other predictions which did not eventuate, Eamon also wanted people to believe in his prediction, nay personal assurance, of the then IMMINENT demise of SGG.<br />Now a decade later people here still claim the demise of SGG is imminent.<br /> <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-14508120381796461622018-01-17T19:25:33.526-05:002018-01-17T19:25:33.526-05:00Where is "Eamon" to respond to this?Where is "Eamon" to respond to this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-51575225858497430952018-01-16T11:26:49.129-05:002018-01-16T11:26:49.129-05:00This isn't the ode l, but it has reference to ...This isn't the ode l, but it has reference to it: <br />https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/letter-to-a-doubter/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-41055816968172362292018-01-15T22:42:36.716-05:002018-01-15T22:42:36.716-05:00Where can one find this "Ode"?Where can one find this "Ode"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-13131070836875726262018-01-15T17:48:48.728-05:002018-01-15T17:48:48.728-05:00I distinctly remember that Ode to Reality and how ...I distinctly remember that Ode to Reality and how you, Eamon, stated publicly that the Ode was not accusing them of anything! Now you say it was.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-85732025444033974082018-01-14T13:19:20.965-05:002018-01-14T13:19:20.965-05:00The cult masters didn't realize it then, but p...The cult masters didn't realize it then, but publication of the <i>Ode</i> was a watershed, signaling the beginning of the end of the SW Ohio cult. It made it impossible to respect these religious buccaneers and forever changed attitudes to the "clergy." Dannie and Checkie were fools to have provoked the moral outrage. Wiser heads would have seen it coming and made amends. Instead, they opened a Pandora's box.<br /><br />The Feb. 22 "consecration" (LOL) will administer the <i>coup de grâce</i>. The long sectarian nightmare is almost over, practically speaking.<br /><br />Of course, the Readers won't abandon their posts until the cult kingpins fold their tattered tents for good and ruefully steal away.<br /><br />Decent trads everywhere will remain grateful to the redoubtable <b>Gladius Veritatis</b>. Best wishes to you and yours for 2018.The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-69377027785690458162018-01-14T10:35:48.228-05:002018-01-14T10:35:48.228-05:00Thank you for such a clear, concise post relating ...Thank you for such a clear, concise post relating indisputable facts. His Irrelevance has been granting these "dispensations" for years. He and his are merely playing church, as exposed in the Ode to Reality almost 10 years ago. A peaceful, prosperous 2018 to all who read these words. Eamonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04127621846398943006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-52889879871671088532018-01-13T19:16:35.859-05:002018-01-13T19:16:35.859-05:00WE ARE LEGION.
No one here posts under "Anon...WE ARE LEGION.<br /><br />No one here posts under "Anonymous." Some are authorized to post under "The Reader," others under "Pistrina Liturgica." Others are moderators.<br /><br />We assure you that nothing we post is of no value to the traditional Catholic seeking to escape the cults.The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-81014805825175180742018-01-13T15:19:44.955-05:002018-01-13T15:19:44.955-05:00I haven't been reading or participating in thi...I haven't been reading or participating in this, but just today did a very quick cursory view of the HUGE amount of posts in the comments area. My question is: I see that "The Reader" drives this whole thing, yet keeps speaking with "We" and "Our" talking about some kind of staff. Apparently you want to remain anonymous, but can we have the number of your staff? Can you tell us the number/names of them that answer question here with a fixed moniker, and how many post with "Anonymous"?<br />The Floccinaucinihilipilificatorhttp://thesaurus.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-81841130745834909112018-01-13T11:53:20.532-05:002018-01-13T11:53:20.532-05:00Well, since the comments are pretty much played ou...Well, since the comments are pretty much played out by now, we don't see any harm in providing it here. At this late stage, it won't distract from the conversation:<br /><br />"A guest who on a day of abstinence is invited to a meal that he knows to be prepared from meats is obliged <i>per se</i> to decline the invitation, and he can then only accept it licitly if as a result of refusal [he suffers] a noteworthy disadvantage such as a grave offense: he ought justly to fear enmities. — A guest who outside expectation discovers the whole meal prepared from meats licitly eats meats if he can neither obtain other foods nor take leave without grave disadvantage."The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-19962800580851864512018-01-13T11:29:57.548-05:002018-01-13T11:29:57.548-05:00Hard to believe some people can be this dense!!Hard to believe some people can be this dense!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-55628645831037884682018-01-13T01:15:08.484-05:002018-01-13T01:15:08.484-05:00Anon @ 1:54 pm
On which point do you disagree, my...Anon @ 1:54 pm<br /><br />On which point do you disagree, my sede compadre?<br /><br />Specifically, Friday Abstinence <br /><br />Are far as sedevacantists are concerned it is quite clear when it comes to Friday abstinence. Abstain unless the excuse for not doing so is unequivocal. Otherwise it's a mortal sin. Simple. No sane sede can object to the above.<br /><br />Btw, do us (sedes) a favor and cease referring to Canon Law as "Cannon Law."<br />It's embarrassing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-21366101848036385892018-01-12T22:11:25.582-05:002018-01-12T22:11:25.582-05:00The ReaderJanuary 12, 2018 at 6:35 AM
Please supp...The ReaderJanuary 12, 2018 at 6:35 AM<br /><br />Please supply a literal and intelligible translation here for all to see.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-41628710814059392842018-01-12T21:24:20.542-05:002018-01-12T21:24:20.542-05:00We're not "fighting" you.
From our ...We're not "fighting" you.<br /><br />From our position that the 1917 CCL is suspended, we simply cannot affirm it is <i>immoral</i> or sinful to disregard it. Why? Because we believe it is not in force, plus there's no one to impose sanctions for its violation and no one to amend it. But we do think that even as dead letter it offers a guide to conduct in this prolonged crisis.<br /><br />We do agree with you that the <i>sede</i> "clergy" who imagine the 1917 CCL is operative are obligated to adhere to it. But as you see, many don't. The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-27689802989856296202018-01-12T21:07:42.002-05:002018-01-12T21:07:42.002-05:00No, I didn't miss the "point" you ar...No, I didn't miss the "point" you are trying to introduce. But my point, if you care to remember, is simply that there is a moral obligation for a sede to adhere to Canon Law insofar as is humanly possible. It's not merely a matter of using it as a guide to comport onself. I don't know why you were fighting me on this? The sede clergy are obligated by the 1917 CoCL. If you can cite concrete examples of where they've contravened that is obviously not good. But it's besides my point. <br /><br />And sedes should understand that when it comes to fast and abstinence on a Friday they MUST refrain from stuffing meat in their pie holes UNLESS there is a valid excuse which they can apply which is found in the manuals. This is coming from a sede.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-2743629082966705042018-01-12T20:51:04.116-05:002018-01-12T20:51:04.116-05:00OK. We agree no one — Catholic or impostor — shoul...OK. We agree no one — Catholic or impostor — should ordain bozos with canonical impediments.<br /><br />Then why do <i>sede</i>s ordain men with impediments? Are you saying they're immoral?<br /><br />And, no, we didn't miss your point. We make perfect sense, as usual. You missed <i>our</i> point.<br />The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-75090330664667944422018-01-12T19:51:07.038-05:002018-01-12T19:51:07.038-05:00You make no sense, as usual. It doesn't matte...You make no sense, as usual. It doesn't matter which "type" of bishop. It would be immoral to ordain a man with an impediment to the priesthood, period. I think you'll find that law in the 1917 CoCL and in the 1983 "CoCL." <br />Again, You missed my point entirely. Time to rethink. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-44950998230894764742018-01-12T19:38:20.411-05:002018-01-12T19:38:20.411-05:00We were demonstrating the hypocrisy of the sede cu...We were demonstrating the hypocrisy of the <i>sede</i> cults, which hide behind canon law when it serves them and flout it when it doesn't.The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.com