tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post2284343462493458236..comments2023-08-07T21:58:26.720-04:00Comments on Pistrina Liturgica: WELCOME HAPPY MORNINGThe Readerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comBlogger65125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-80669912262045627402016-04-08T13:09:37.194-04:002016-04-08T13:09:37.194-04:00"My question to you is, do you know what it m..."My question to you is, do you know what it means to have reserve?" Actually, I didn't when I wrote my post. I was reading a bio of St. John Vianney and almost immediately after posting bio praised him for his reserve in that he wrote a letter to someone apologizing and setting record straight on another person he had mistakenly slandered. Unfortunately, not sure how it matters that you know some N.O. bishops who have great reserve, when priests like the following are permitted to prey on adolescents. <br /><br />See page 2<br />http://www.behindthepinecurtain.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/20121110_Ward_V3_Redacted.pdf<br /><br />http://www.donaldwuerl.com/2012/05/wuerl-in-background-of-evil.html <br /><br />"Luther and the Halloween Mass" Good news for you: at this time N.O. has not yet declared halloween a holy day of obligation, BUT each time you go to the N.O. mass you may as well be attending Luther/Calvin/Welsley's "reformed" (un) mass (it is what NO intended). <br />http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2016/03/31/reformation-is-nothing-to-celebrate-says-cardinal-muller/<br /><br />http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_just.htm<br /><br />http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2016/04/07/pope_francis_addresses_methodist_guests_full_text/1220885<br /><br />You say Francis isn't a wise man, but you seem to be equally foolish to think that God would have anything to do w/heresies currently being taught the faithful. If God would have nothing to do w/high priests and pharisees of his time, surely it is now far closer to 70 AD than 33 AD when they killed Jesus Christ. It is questionable that any "sacraments" or any "priesthood" remain in what you call the "church". You say trad bishops act like children on the playground; i say that many are protestant charlatans/wolves seeking money, but those you call bishops are poisonous snakes and/or businessmen/ wolves (absolutely no love for Jesus Christ/souls either). Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-73316922940107281302016-04-08T12:42:15.844-04:002016-04-08T12:42:15.844-04:00Forgot to add one last Lent 2016 NO abomination: r...Forgot to add one last Lent 2016 NO abomination: rec'd in an Easter Card Frank Pavone "Novena to Reverse HHS mandate" which was nothing but a novena for freedom of conscience, religous liberty, ecumenicide and every shibboleth of N.O. devil worship--never once mentions contraception! <br /><br />http://www.priestsforlife.org/novenas/novena.aspx?id=8 <br /><br />How they turn anyone who even wants to pray into voices for the devil.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-47502579264248505242016-04-04T21:00:17.438-04:002016-04-04T21:00:17.438-04:00"Your statement couldn't be anymore incor..."Your statement couldn't be anymore incorrect because after all this has been the tireless and endless struggle within the Church. Name a time when there hasn't been an abuse or aberration which led to mass confusion?" <br /><br />Are you out of your mind? I hope so because when you face your judge, Jesus Christ, you will have to defend this statement. You might start preparing your defense by naming ONE time in the Church's history where the Church, herself, taught that hell was empty, that those who didn't profess Jesus Christ or even belong to His Church were "saved" that Jews, Muslims, atheists etc. didn't need to be converted and that spreading the Gospel was solemn nonsense, that sodomy is natural and that the sin of sodom was buh who knows? That the (holy) bible was a collection of stories handed down by oral tradition that got confused between gospel writers who didn't know the difference between Marys' or sin and disease? If you want more info, consult your Lenten preparation "little black book" written by a sodomite pervert given to you w/your CRS rice bowl-bullet (so you can contribute to killing black babies) by your Cardinal McCarrick piece of used toilet paper parish pervert (in this case Holy Redeemer, College Park MD)? <br /><br />http://www.amazon.com/Little-Black-Book-Lent-2016-ebook/dp/B01A9U7Y8G<br /><br />http://www.littlebooks.us/<br /><br />http://www.rcf.org/Old_web/Press/AMDG/1998aprilframe01.htm<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Black_Book<br /><br />When was Crazy Dan (or the Catholic Church) ever so crazy as to send out letters (during Lent like I rec'd from Cardinal Burke) asking for money from his cultings so he could get 1 million Catholics to storm heaven w/prayer by saying ONE rosary a MONTH -- (how long can they make this rip off last -- seems the website even has a shop)? Is this how the Church ALWAYS got the faithful to pray, Critic?<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1In7yFGDug <br /><br />Then on Easter Wednesday, all the Catholic Colleges can cap off the Easter activities by indoctrinating their cultings in why not commit grave, mortal sin w/the world, the flesh & the devil (it's our culture!):<br /><br />https://www.facebook.com/catholicterps/photos/a.10150357223759210.369820.77807544209/10154046083394210/?type=3&theater<br />https://www.facebook.com/events/813604305432161/<br /><br />http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/news/catholic-college-teaches-students-about-drag-culture-an-artistic-expression/#.VwL5kPkrJUQ<br /><br />Sure, the Church, has always praised abortionists:<br /><br />https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-calls-italys-foremost-abortion-promoter-one-of-nations-forgotten-great<br /><br />P.S. Re: constipation: don't think it can be caused by apples/oat cookies, but possibly due to nervous tension of someone snapping fingers at you etc. Sometimes it helps to not take such behavior personally. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-51432964178788592162016-04-03T22:41:49.379-04:002016-04-03T22:41:49.379-04:00What theory are you talking about? And why don'...What theory are you talking about? And why don't you answer any question?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-47247632247003631672016-04-03T18:55:16.351-04:002016-04-03T18:55:16.351-04:00Once again, you pose your theory of sand which blo...Once again, you pose your theory of sand which blows in the wind and continues the erosion of your belief. The Critichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03620589067199847326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-12313178007570367392016-04-03T15:38:34.112-04:002016-04-03T15:38:34.112-04:00Conspiracy theory and pride? Are you a full blown ...Conspiracy theory and pride? Are you a full blown Novus Ordite, Critic? Do you go to the new mass?<br /><br />Become members of Christ's Church? And which Church is that? The one that teaches all religions are more or less good? That no one needs to be a member of it? That Jews don't need to convert? The one that has a Protestant mass and sacraments? Is this the Church you're saying I should become a member of?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-21604177559656813422016-04-03T15:35:37.241-04:002016-04-03T15:35:37.241-04:001:08, since you say you've read what the Dimon...1:08, since you say you've read what the Dimonds and Cekada & co. have said against the FSSP, why are you even asking me to "define terms" and explain why I said they're bought?<br /><br />Your comment is self-refuting.<br /><br />Anyone who knows anything about this will understand what it means for them to be bought and compromisers. It is up to you to prove why you think otherwise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-35023926872391590592016-04-03T12:58:55.390-04:002016-04-03T12:58:55.390-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.The Critichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03620589067199847326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-85438909645654334842016-04-03T12:56:36.717-04:002016-04-03T12:56:36.717-04:00This is addressed to all the Anon Sedevacatist pos...This is addressed to all the Anon Sedevacatist posters. I too am not impressed with the manner in which you try to prove your existence. Your whole premise is built on the sands of conspiracy theory and pride. I don't know about you, but I would not base my eternal salvation the mere opinions of the imposer Sedelandia bishops. So keep your punch line of "ipso facto" to yourselves, repent, and become members of Christ's Church. <br />The Critichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03620589067199847326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-87981176676850350842016-04-03T09:36:54.472-04:002016-04-03T09:36:54.472-04:00"Just because you're on a diet," he ..."Just because you're on a diet," he said, "doesn't mean you can't look at the menu."<br /><br />Sounds like the opposite of what one finds in reliable Catholic books. Yes, a virtuous man may notice and admire a woman's beauty, but not in a carnal sense as the uncouth analogy to dieting and the menu implies.<br /><br />This passage from the <a href="http://www.saintsbooks.net/books/St.%20Anthony%20Mary%20Claret%20-%20The%20Autobiography%20of.pdf" rel="nofollow">Autobiography of St. Anthony Mary Claret</a> comes to mind:<br /><br />95. I had the following experience while I was in my second year of philosophy at Vich. That winter I had caught a bad cold and was ordered to bed; so I obeyed. One day as I lay there at about ten-thirty in the morning, I felt a terrible temptation. I turned to Mary, called on my guardian angel, and prayed to all my name-saints as well as to those to whom I have a special devotion. I fixed my attention on indifferent objects so as to distract myself and forget about the temptation. I made the sign of the cross on my forehead so that the Lord would free me from evil thoughts, but everything I did was in vain.<br />96. Finally I turned over on my other side, to see if the temptation would go away, when suddenly I saw the Blessed Virgin Mary, <b>very beautiful and gracious.</b> Her dress was crimson, her mantle blue, and in her arms I saw a huge garland of the most beautiful roses. I had seen lovely artificial and real roses in Barcelona but none as lovely as these. How beautiful it all was! As I lay face up in bed, I saw myself as a beautiful white child kneeling with hands joined. I never lost sight of the Blessed Virgin, on whom I kept my eyes fixed. I remember distinctly thinking to myself, "She is a woman and yet she doesn't give you any evil thoughts; on the contrary, she has taken them all away from you." The Blessed Virgin spoke to me and said, "Anthony, this crown is yours if you overcome." Next I saw the Blessed Virgin place on my head the crown of roses that she held in her right hand (besides the garland, which she held between her arm and her right side). I saw myself crowned with roses in the person of that little child, and I was speechless.<br />97. I also saw a band of saints standing at her right hand, in an attitude of prayer. I didn't recognize them, except that one seemed to be St. Stephen. I believed then, as I do now, that those were my patron saints praying and interceding for me so that I wouldn't fall into the temptation. Then, on my left, I saw a great crowd of demons in battle array, like soldiers who fall back and close ranks again after a battle. I said to myself, "What a host of them there is--and so fearful!" During all of this I remained as if caught by surprise, without quite realizing what was happening to me. As soon as it had passed, I felt free of the temptation and filled with a joy so deep that I couldn't grasp what had been going on within me. <br />98. I am quite sure that I was neither asleep nor suffering from dizziness or anything else that could have caused a state of illusion. What made me believe that what had happened was real, and a special grace from Mary, was the fact that from that moment on I was free from temptation and for many years stayed free of any temptation against chastity. If later there have been any such temptations, they have been so insignificant that they hardly deserve to be called temptations. Glory to Mary! Victory through Mary!<br /><br />So yes, one might admire a woman's beauty, especially that of the Blessed Virgin, <i>super omnes speciosa</i>. But to speak of her being on or off the menu would be most disgraceful if not blasphemous.reticito nominenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-33705867856370458122016-04-03T09:08:37.807-04:002016-04-03T09:08:37.807-04:00Dear John,
As a youngish man myself, I can defini...Dear John,<br /><br />As a youngish man myself, I can definitely sympathize with you. The real Catholic answer to your question is that one should avoid the company of immodest women as far as possible, because to look at them and converse with them invites temptations against purity. If one cannot avoid them, then God will give the grace to avoid sin, but to go into their company without good reason is to invite a fall.<br /><br />You mentioned that you are unmarried but you're “with” a beautiful woman. If your relationship is unchaste then this is a big problem. Likewise, but to a lesser degree, if she is not a Catholic or is not likely to become a Catholic before you marry.<br /><br />Here is some relevant advice from good Catholic sources:<br /><br /><a href="https://archive.org/details/sermonsforallsun00liguuoft" rel="nofollow">Sermons of St. Alphonsus Liguori</a>:<br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/sermonsforallsun00liguuoft#page/n170/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">Avoiding Occasions of Sin</a><br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/sermonsforallsun00liguuoft#page/n324/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">Avoiding Bad Company</a><br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/sermonsforallsun00liguuoft#page/n348/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">Impurity</a><br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/sermonsforallsun00liguuoft#page/n367/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">Bad Thoughts</a><br /><br />St. Francis de Sales, <i><a href="https://archive.org/details/introductiontode00franuoft" rel="nofollow">Introduction to the Devout Life</a>:</i><br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/introductiontode00franuoft#page/167/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">The Necessity of Chastity</a><br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/introductiontode00franuoft#page/172/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">How to Preserve Chastity</a><br /><br />Rev. Martin J. Scott, S.J., <i><a href="https://archive.org/details/youandyourspract00scotuoft" rel="nofollow">You and Yours: Practical Talks on Home Life</a></i>:<br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/youandyourspract00scotuoft#page/n110/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">Dangers to Young Men</a><br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/youandyourspract00scotuoft#page/n123/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">Women and Dress</a><br /> <a href="https://archive.org/stream/youandyourspract00scotuoft#page/n148/mode/1up" rel="nofollow">Young Men and Courtship</a><br /><br />Rule of St. Augustine:<br /> <a href="http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/source/ruleaug.html#Safeguarding%20Chastity" rel="nofollow">Safeguarding Chastity, and Fraternal Correction</a><br /><br />Wishing you all success. All difficulties can be overcome with prayer, especially with the Rosary.<br /><br />reticito nominenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-15908415381776248382016-04-03T02:58:30.834-04:002016-04-03T02:58:30.834-04:00"Liturgical lumpemproletariat", LOL! Tha..."Liturgical lumpemproletariat", LOL! That's something to remember.Tarquiniushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03306860641737970883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-22744012813650618272016-04-02T21:59:51.681-04:002016-04-02T21:59:51.681-04:00Message received and understood.
We do know clerg...Message received and understood.<br /><br />We do know clergy who sacrifice for the souls under their care. It's just that they don't belong to these bishop-led cults. Perhaps that's a result of our limited acquaintance.The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-88163719528001659532016-04-02T19:32:38.129-04:002016-04-02T19:32:38.129-04:00I happen to agree with the above post and its &quo...I happen to agree with the above post and its "intentions." I have indeed witnessed first hand some of the allegations as well as the oft sited complaints about the individual groups. However, affording my redundancy, I have also witnessed much sacrifice and good from the particular group I happen to be affiliated with, the CMRI. Also, I simply wanted to engage the poster who accused the Bishop of abuse and I stand by my assertion that it was calumnious, and that I feel very strongly that I am in as good a position to make this argument as any. I enjoy reading this blog my friends but at the risk of sounding as a cult member it wouldn't hurt to once in a while sing some praises of those, whether right or wrong, who provide for many of us at their own sacrifice. I have the feeling at times that the only thing that would satisfy the writer is everyone would just abandon what they are doing in defense of family and faith and just agree to everything you write or you allow to be written. None of us has a shred of authority in these matters at all. Please accept this as I intend it; in charity and as one simple man's opinion who is trying to save his soul, practice the faith as always taught and raising a plethora of children. God bless each and every one of you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-40612754283974257382016-04-02T19:08:29.746-04:002016-04-02T19:08:29.746-04:00To anon @ 7:24AM, April 02 2016
Your ipse dixit i...To anon @ 7:24AM, April 02 2016<br /><br />Your <i>ipse dixit</i> is quite unimpressive on this matter. <br /><br />"BOUGHT"? Please define your terms to begin with, after that the burden of proof is on you. Even the Zirconia Brothers make better arguments than yourself or the various sede episcopus vagans on this issue.<br /> <br />This type of rabble-rouser rhetoric and accusations may be a big hit with the <b>liturgical <i>lumpenproletariat</i></b> of sedelandia but I'm not buying it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-39750116575147088512016-04-02T18:01:28.289-04:002016-04-02T18:01:28.289-04:00Apr. 2, 11:01 PM,
CMRI clergy are definitely NOT ...Apr. 2, 11:01 PM,<br /><br />CMRI clergy are definitely NOT a good choice owing to their formation (although they may give an agreeable answer to his queries). John must first quiz any "priest" he contacts about the depth of his study of moral theology. Inasmuch as most of them haven't a clue as to how inferior their formation has been, he's better off reading books from the good ol' days, or contacting FSSP or SSPX clergy.The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-46666462361429807532016-04-02T17:09:20.388-04:002016-04-02T17:09:20.388-04:00Just to make one point to "The Critic"&#...Just to make one point to "The Critic"'s disjointed and mostly unintelligible comment, I think it's a pretty tenuous claim to say that Bp. Thuc died within the conciliar "church". He was kidnapped towards the end of his life by a bunch of modernist priests, who held him literally incommunicado in some modernist religious house. They claim that he signed some sort of "repentance" in his last days, but obviously any document signed by a hostage doesn't prove anything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-86965732819297271912016-04-02T17:01:44.488-04:002016-04-02T17:01:44.488-04:00John Smith, you are very much to be commended for ...John Smith, you are very much to be commended for trying to practice the Catholic religion and morality, and I wish you God's grace in doing so. The questions you ask here, though, are things you would be better off discussing with a traditional Catholic priest, who can give you spiritual direction. If there aren't any near you, we are lucky to live in a time when anyone can contact any other person in the world instantaneously through the internet. I recommend you look up the website for some society of traditional Catholic priests (CMRI are a good choice, despite what this blog says) and ask them to give you some direction.<br /><br />Good luck and you are in our prayers!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-19778577681994984622016-04-02T15:07:57.640-04:002016-04-02T15:07:57.640-04:00Pace Apr. 2, 6:47 & 8:05 PM, but this blog is ...<i>Pace</i> Apr. 2, 6:47 & 8:05 PM, but this blog is neither an advocate for any of the institutions you mentioned nor is it their enemy, provided they do not oppose tradition.<br /><br />As we have said before, we hold to the position we call "aliquid pravism," from the Latin <i>aliquid pravi</i>, "something wrong": any individual or group that acknowledges that something is wrong with the V II establishment in Rome and desires a return to pre-V II tradition is our brother and comrade-in-arms, so to speak. We won't speak against them, even if, out of good conscience, we might not elect to receive the sacraments from them.<br /><br />The support staff of this blog represent all sides:<i>sede</i> (both absolute & <i>materialiter</i>), R & R, and traditionalist or conservative Novus Ordite. Inasmuch as no one anywhere knows the answer to the dilemma confronting the Church, we agree to refrain from unproductive partisanship to focus our efforts on ending the reign of error imposed by the malformed, bishop-led cults, which, out of self-interest, promote division among Catholics, thereby hindering the advancement of the traditionalist cause.<br /><br />Our opposition to these ecclesiastical entrepreneurs doesn't stem from private grievance, as they allege. Instead, it is informed by the conviction that tradition is better served — and advanced — when fundamentally like-minded Catholics pool their efforts to effect a change of attitude among those still attached to the abuses of the Robber Church of V II. Clerical bad actors encourage these souls to stay with the V II Establishment.<br /><br />Once tradition-loving Catholics reject the toxic cult masters, the better able we'll all be to labor for the Restoration. Our particular contribution is to demonstrate that the cult masters are as alien to tradition in their own way as the depraved Modernists.The Readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09191910319072202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-63705714814798629532016-04-02T14:05:03.873-04:002016-04-02T14:05:03.873-04:00This blog has become an apology and P.R. for the n...This blog has become an apology and P.R. for the novus ordo/SSPX.<br />I don't blame you all if the money is good.It would be hard to turn down if I was extremely bitter and wanting revenge.<br />BTW I don't know any of these people you are looking to destroy. It does get irritating reading how wonderful amazing beautiful etc the novus ordo ecclesia dei/SSPX is on a weekly basis.Best of luck Mates,I hope you all have a wonderful weekend.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-16491437688087958232016-04-02T12:47:54.183-04:002016-04-02T12:47:54.183-04:00To April 1, 2:27 (Anonymous) Thank you for your re...To April 1, 2:27 (Anonymous) Thank you for your reply, sarcastic as it was. To your first question, which set the tone of your reply, I am neither blind, deaf (however my wife would suggest otherwise) and certainly not misled although this last assertion is ambiguous at best. If I was misled how could I respond? If mislead I would not know this now would I? I don't simply make the claim of knowing the Bishop for some 25 years, I absolutely have known him and the majority of his priests for that long. I already stated to the readers that I agree with much of what makes up the bulk of charges on this list. It simply is not the purpose of my original post. If it helps you, since you asked, my major disagreements are involved with discernment, the promotion of NFP to the newly married amongst other issues. My son's particular issue was over his admission that he would not teach it after ordination so their was a mutual agreement to leave. Now, that being said I have no intention of arguing or debating the other comments you made; it would accomplish nothing at all.<br /><br />My original post, an uncommon event as I said, was to simply to respond to what I thought was a calumnious charge of "abuse". I appreciate your response on that and will say I actually agree with some of the things you have said. I scoff at your attempt to show I am blind or deaf or mislead. I believe that you weaken the rest of your story by that ad hominen remark. Am I to to gather that your charge of abuse against the Bishop is that he clicks his fingers in class and subjectively treats you as children. If so I stand by my defense. I can objectively defend my remark of their passion to save souls because my family has been on the receiving end as well as countless folks I know in many other private chapels. I certainly am willing to acknowledge that you may have had different experiences. For me, the alternative of the FSSP or SSPX is not an option and the one thing about this particular blog that has always confused me is an ambiguous support of the modern Vat II church and the FSSP. If that Vat. II new church is the Catholic Church this blog and all we due as Trads during this crisis is completely irrelevant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-78667732416025534262016-04-02T01:24:01.750-04:002016-04-02T01:24:01.750-04:00The FSSP and other similar BOUGHT groups are a pac...The FSSP and other similar BOUGHT groups are a pack of heretical cowards who don't denounce the modernists but instead want to be "accepted" by them; they make it seem being faithful to Catholicism is all just a matter of taste and preference. <br /><br />These are the people you say are "in the Church"? Cowards who are in communion with open heretics and apostates?<br /><br />Don't make me laugh, "Critic."<br /><br />You're a disgrace, along with all the other bought and compromised groups. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-18584852602605058152016-04-01T22:50:37.220-04:002016-04-01T22:50:37.220-04:00Quite the interesting perspective, wouldn't yo...Quite the interesting perspective, wouldn't you say?The Critichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03620589067199847326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-50720899418175083042016-04-01T21:18:55.416-04:002016-04-01T21:18:55.416-04:00The standard in CMRI schools is shocking.The standard in CMRI schools is shocking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-426244098779533128.post-49845083731437343572016-04-01T20:34:07.372-04:002016-04-01T20:34:07.372-04:00The Critic-what was the background to Father Kevin...The Critic-what was the background to Father Kevin Vaillancourt?We have heard numbers of stories.Did he leave CMRI or was he kicked by Pivarunas?All we do know is he opened a new Chapel and took upwards of 150 MSM people.All earsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com